Friday, November 15, 2013

Irving Howe's "At the Center of Hardy's Achievement"


For this blog I will be focusing on one essay in particular: Irving Howe’s “Tess of the d’Urbervilles—At the Center of Hardy’s Achievement”.  A major theme in his essay is the protection and defense of women.  How opens his essay with “Thomas Hardy was endowed with a precious gift:  he liked women.”(Howe 406)  He acknowledges that some readers may not like Hardy’s novel and the way he chose to write it, and claims that Hardy himself is a character in the novel, which serves the role of the omniscient narrator who “does not care to pass judgment on his characters.”(407) Howe comes full circle to this observation in the end of his essay when he brings into discussion the idea of Hardy placing himself in the novel to watch over her, “like a stricken father.  He is as tender to Tess as Tess is to the world.  Tender; and helpless.”(422) Howe really stresses in this essay that Hardy is a talented author, but that the “secondary characters” have just as much to say and could serve just as much of a purpose as Tess herself, but that Hardy does not give them the opportunity to do so, particularly in his omniscient role, which is why he stresses the “helpless” in his character.
            I think it’s really refreshing to hear from a critic who is defensive of the author while acknowledging the current criticism surrounding their work; Howe even identifies some of Hardy’s faults, in his writing, such as the plainness of the plot, and it’s similarity to the popular literature at the time.  He says, “As for the plot, it seems in isolation a paltry thing, a mere scraping together of bits and pieces from popular melodrama:  a pure girl betrayed, a woman’s secret to be told or hidden, a piling on of woes that must strain the resources of ordinary credence.”(409)  Howe’s criticism is mingled in with his praise of Hardy’s work, which definitely an indication that he can understand that Hardy has imperfections in his work, but it can also be “one of the greatest examples we have in English literature of how a writer can take hold of a cultural stereotype and, through the sheer intensity of his affection, pare and purify it into something that is morally ennobling.”(408) I can really appreciate the opinion of a critic when they not only present the reasons they support an author’s work, but they also acknowledge its imperfections, and Howe does exactly this in his essay.

4 comments:

  1. This was the essay that I looked at too and I am glad that you and I seemed to see a lot of the same things in it! I completely agree with you, it was really nice and like you say, "refreshing" to read a critic who was not just talking about the book itself but of the author. She definitely defends Hardy and praises not only him and his writing but his intentions of Tess. I thought it was really neat how she criticizes Tess (almost always in a positive light) but through that criticism she is always addressing Hardy. I really like this essay and am glad you got a lot out of it like I did! It makes you realize something's about the book that you may not have before. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I did not read this one, so it was nice to read your opinions on it!
    It is always refreshing to hear a perspective that you can really agree with. I personally agree with what you say about the value in a critic that acknowledges reality but can still make a fair judgement on the piece. It gets confusing trying to place critics and their view points but it sounds like Howe does a nice job catching up the reader so everyone can be on the same page. Good entry and I might have to go back and take a peak at that one!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Marcy,
    It's funny that this was the piece you read since you love the book and hate Tess as a character! The idea of Hardy being one of the characters of the book is an interesting one. I could see that point because it seems clear that the narrator's voice is a little biased and definitely in love with Tess a little bit! I don't know, I liked that but maybe it is a little too heavy-handed on Hardy's part? The subtitle of the book calling her a 'pure woman' kind of does that same thing too. It's interesting at least!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Marcy, I think it is great that you focused on the part of Irving's essay that says Hardy took a hold of a stereotype and shaped it. The Virginia Wolfe piece also focused on Hardy's use of types and I think understanding that better really helps bring an overall sense to the novel. Great blog!

    ReplyDelete