For this blog I
will be focusing on one essay in particular: Irving Howe’s “Tess of the d’Urbervilles—At the Center
of Hardy’s Achievement”. A major
theme in his essay is the protection and defense of women. How opens his essay with “Thomas Hardy
was endowed with a precious gift:
he liked women.”(Howe 406)
He acknowledges that some readers may not like Hardy’s novel and the way
he chose to write it, and claims that Hardy himself is a character in the novel,
which serves the role of the omniscient narrator who “does not care to pass
judgment on his characters.”(407) Howe comes full circle to this observation in
the end of his essay when he brings into discussion the idea of Hardy placing
himself in the novel to watch over her, “like a stricken father. He is as tender to Tess as Tess is to
the world. Tender; and
helpless.”(422) Howe really stresses in this essay that Hardy is a talented
author, but that the “secondary characters” have just as much to say and could
serve just as much of a purpose as Tess herself, but that Hardy does not give
them the opportunity to do so, particularly in his omniscient role, which is
why he stresses the “helpless” in his character.
I
think it’s really refreshing to hear from a critic who is defensive of the
author while acknowledging the current criticism surrounding their work; Howe
even identifies some of Hardy’s faults, in his writing, such as the plainness
of the plot, and it’s similarity to the popular literature at the time. He says, “As for the plot, it seems in
isolation a paltry thing, a mere scraping together of bits and pieces from
popular melodrama: a pure girl
betrayed, a woman’s secret to be told or hidden, a piling on of woes that must
strain the resources of ordinary credence.”(409) Howe’s criticism is mingled in with his praise of Hardy’s
work, which definitely an indication that he can understand that Hardy has
imperfections in his work, but it can also be “one of the greatest examples we
have in English literature of how a writer can take hold of a cultural
stereotype and, through the sheer intensity of his affection, pare and purify
it into something that is morally ennobling.”(408) I can really appreciate the
opinion of a critic when they not only present the reasons they support an
author’s work, but they also acknowledge its imperfections, and Howe does
exactly this in his essay.
This was the essay that I looked at too and I am glad that you and I seemed to see a lot of the same things in it! I completely agree with you, it was really nice and like you say, "refreshing" to read a critic who was not just talking about the book itself but of the author. She definitely defends Hardy and praises not only him and his writing but his intentions of Tess. I thought it was really neat how she criticizes Tess (almost always in a positive light) but through that criticism she is always addressing Hardy. I really like this essay and am glad you got a lot out of it like I did! It makes you realize something's about the book that you may not have before. :)
ReplyDeleteI did not read this one, so it was nice to read your opinions on it!
ReplyDeleteIt is always refreshing to hear a perspective that you can really agree with. I personally agree with what you say about the value in a critic that acknowledges reality but can still make a fair judgement on the piece. It gets confusing trying to place critics and their view points but it sounds like Howe does a nice job catching up the reader so everyone can be on the same page. Good entry and I might have to go back and take a peak at that one!
Marcy,
ReplyDeleteIt's funny that this was the piece you read since you love the book and hate Tess as a character! The idea of Hardy being one of the characters of the book is an interesting one. I could see that point because it seems clear that the narrator's voice is a little biased and definitely in love with Tess a little bit! I don't know, I liked that but maybe it is a little too heavy-handed on Hardy's part? The subtitle of the book calling her a 'pure woman' kind of does that same thing too. It's interesting at least!
Marcy, I think it is great that you focused on the part of Irving's essay that says Hardy took a hold of a stereotype and shaped it. The Virginia Wolfe piece also focused on Hardy's use of types and I think understanding that better really helps bring an overall sense to the novel. Great blog!
ReplyDelete